Language policy, educational equality, and dual language bilingual education in the U.S. — The Association Specialists

Language policy, educational equality, and dual language bilingual education in the U.S. (20120)

Kara M Rash 1 , David C Johnson 1
  1. University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States

This paper analyses the growth in Dual Language Bilingual Education (DLBE) programs in the United States. A changing linguistic ecology has encouraged educators and policymakers to innovate language policies and practices that expand DLBE programs. While the growth in multilingual programs is a potentially positive development for educational equity, and normalizing (as ordinary) multilingual education, this paper analyses two major challenges: (1) a lack of resources and professional development necessary to maintain high quality DLBE programs, and (2) the exacerbation of power imbalances omnipresent in U.S. education.

We begin with a historical-structural analysis (Tollefson, 2015) of how “dual language” has eclipsed “bilingual” in federal and state language policy. Intertextual data analyses (Fairclough, 1992) reveal how a history of language policy text and discourse, informed by hegemonic language ideologies, has marginalized the word “bilingual” while concomitantly promoting dual language programs that, not surprisingly, accommodate and sometimes privilege White English speakers. Sometimes referred to as the gentrification of bilingual education (Palmer & García-Mateus, 2022), this analysis reveals how this educational phenomenon is connected to changing language policy.

We then analyse how language policy has been interpreted and appropriated in K-12 schools and focus on data collected during a 5-year project in the U.S. state of Iowa. Data were collected in focus-group interviews with DLBE teachers and analysis focused on the intertextual connections across the interviews and between the interview and document textual data.

We argue that DLBE programs at the local level appropriate federal language policy changes that exoticize and marginalize bilingual programs that have historically emphasized the needs of minoritized Spanish speakers. Still, we end with an argument for how DLBE programs can be enhanced to challenge linguistic and sociolinguistic hierarchies and provide educational opportunity for minoritized students.